Seaton's profileThe Emerging Business Ad...BlogLists Tools Help

Blog


    September 28

    Putting Patient Records Online: Do the Incentives Account for the Risks?

     
    In The New York Times today, Steve Lohr wrote an article about how the drive towards making patient records available online has taken a huge step forward by a major New York regional hospital group, North Shore-Long Island Jewish Health System.  The group plans on offering its affiliated doctors subsidies of up to $40,000 each over five years to adopt digital patient records.  This would be in addition to the federal government subsidies for computerizing patient records, which could total $44,000.  The hospitals see this as a two-fold proposition: (1) it allows to share data amongst offices, labs, and hospitals that reduce unnecessary tests and cut down on medical mistakes; and (2) it's a way for the hospitals to strengthen their bonds with their doctors, due to the fact that some independent doctors affiliate with more than one organization.
     
    According to Mr. Lohr, the government-backed campaign to hasten the adoption of electronic health records has the potential not only to change how health care is delivered.  It could also influence which institutions emerge as leaders in delivering care, as some local markets consolidate further.  “We are going to change how we deliver care, and we should be held accountable for outcomes — not just measured on the number of procedures performed,” Mr. Dowling said.  Indeed, the rationale for investing in digital records is that the technology can be used to help monitor and measure the results of care, providing the evidence needed to shift remuneration away from the current fee-for-service system, which encourages more tests, more procedures and more pills prescribed.
     
    With all this talk about "incentives", healthcare providers need to ensure its patients that their personal healthcare information is accessible only to parties with privity.  Having a comprehensive data governance program implemented throughout the organization is the only way for these providers to be assured that the confidentiality, integrity, and accessibility of those records are preserved..  Who is getting accessibility to private medical data, and whether the medium used is adequate to ensure confidentiality, will be determinative of who is held "accountable for outcomes."
     
    To read more about this article, please click here:  E-records Get a Big Endorsement
     

    Comments

    Please wait...
    Sorry, the comment you entered is too long. Please shorten it.
    You didn't enter anything. Please try again.
    Sorry, we can't add your comment right now. Please try again later.
    To add a comment, you need permission from your parent. Ask for permission
    Your parent has turned off comments.
    Sorry, we can't delete your comment right now. Please try again later.
    You've exceeded the maximum number of comments that can be left in one day. Please try again in 24 hours.
    Your account has had the ability to leave comments disabled because our systems indicate that you may be spamming other users. If you believe that your account has been disabled in error please contact Windows Live support.
    Complete the security check below to finish leaving your comment.
    The characters you type in the security check must match the characters in the picture or audio.

    To add a comment, sign in with your Windows Live ID (if you use Hotmail, Messenger, or Xbox LIVE, you have a Windows Live ID). Sign in


    Don't have a Windows Live ID? Sign up

    Trackbacks

    The trackback URL for this entry is:
    http://seatondalylaw.spaces.live.com/blog/cns!64FE6A103972B89!268.trak
    Weblogs that reference this entry
    • None